Core i7-2620M vs Xeon E3-1275 v3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1275 v3
2013
4 cores / 8 threads, 84 Watt
4.66
+197%

Xeon E3-1275 v3 outperforms i7-2620M by a whopping 197% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1275 v3 and Core i7-2620M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking12232023
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.69no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Core i7
Architecture codenameHaswell-WS (2013)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date2 June 2013 (11 years ago)20 February 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$531$346
Current price$327 (0.6x MSRP)$224 (0.6x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1275 v3 and Core i7-2620M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache8192 KB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size160 mm2149 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors1,400 million624 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1275 v3 and Core i7-2620M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1150FCBGA1023,PPGA988
Power consumption (TDP)84 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1275 v3 and Core i7-2620M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® AVX
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+no data
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
SIPP+no data
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FDI++
Fast Memory Access++
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1275 v3 and Core i7-2620M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection++
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1275 v3 and Core i7-2620M are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1275 v3 and Core i7-2620M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s21.3 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD P4600Intel HD Graphics 3000
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency1.25 GHz1.3 GHz
InTru 3D++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1275 v3 and Core i7-2620M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32
eDPno data+
DisplayPortno data+
HDMIno data+
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1275 v3 and Core i7-2620M.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1275 v3 4.66
+197%
i7-2620M 1.57

Xeon E3-1275 v3 outperforms Core i7-2620M by 197% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E3-1275 v3 7205
+197%
i7-2620M 2425

Xeon E3-1275 v3 outperforms Core i7-2620M by 197% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E3-1275 v3 1234
+145%
i7-2620M 503

Xeon E3-1275 v3 outperforms Core i7-2620M by 145% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E3-1275 v3 3892
+285%
i7-2620M 1011

Xeon E3-1275 v3 outperforms Core i7-2620M by 285% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.66 1.57
Recency 2 June 2013 20 February 2011
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 4
Cost $531 $346
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 84 Watt 35 Watt

The Xeon E3-1275 v3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-2620M in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1275 v3 is a server/workstation processor while Core i7-2620M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1275 v3 and Core i7-2620M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1275 v3
Xeon E3-1275 v3
Intel Core i7-2620M
Core i7-2620M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 51 vote

Rate Xeon E3-1275 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 169 votes

Rate Core i7-2620M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1275 v3 or Core i7-2620M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.