Atom Z3740 vs Xeon E3-1270 v5

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1270 v5 and Atom Z3740 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1144not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.07no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon E3no data
Architecture codenameSkylake-DT (2015)Bay Trail-T (2013−2014)
Release date19 October 2015 (8 years ago)27 September 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$339$32

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1270 v5 and Atom Z3740 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.6 GHz1.33 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz1.86 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier36no data
L1 cache256 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die size122 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistors1,750 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1270 v5 and Atom Z3740 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA1151UTFCBGA1380
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt2 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1270 v5 and Atom Z3740. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1270 v5 and Atom Z3740 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key++
MPX+-
Identity Protection-+
SGXYes with both Intel® SPS and Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theftno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1270 v5 and Atom Z3740 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1270 v5 and Atom Z3740. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GB4 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/s17.1 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HD-+
Graphics max frequencyno data667 MHz

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E3-1270 v5 and Atom Z3740 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4N/Ano data
Max resolution over eDPN/Ano data
Max resolution over DisplayPortN/Ano data
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E3-1270 v5 and Atom Z3740 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXN/Ano data
OpenGLN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1270 v5 and Atom Z3740.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1270 v5 8355
+1218%
Atom Z3740 634

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 October 2015 27 September 2013
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 2 Watt

Xeon E3-1270 v5 has an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

Atom Z3740, on the other hand, has 3900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E3-1270 v5 and Atom Z3740. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1270 v5 is a server/workstation processor while Atom Z3740 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1270 v5 and Atom Z3740, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5
Xeon E3-1270 v5
Intel Atom Z3740
Atom Z3740

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 106 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1270 v5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 39 votes

Rate Atom Z3740 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1270 v5 or Atom Z3740, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.