Celeron 1017U vs Xeon E3-1270 v3
Aggregate performance score
Xeon E3-1270 v3 outperforms Celeron 1017U by a whopping 386% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon E3-1270 v3 and Celeron 1017U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1218 | 2397 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.01 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Celeron |
| Architecture codename | Haswell-WS (2013) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
| Release date | 2 June 2013 (11 years ago) | 1 July 2013 (11 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $370 | no data |
| Current price | $190 (0.5x MSRP) | $299 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon E3-1270 v3 and Celeron 1017U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 8 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3.5 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 8192 KB (shared) | 2 MB |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Die size | 160 mm2 | 94 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | 1,400 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E3-1270 v3 and Celeron 1017U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 1150 | FCBGA1023 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 17 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1270 v3 and Celeron 1017U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | no data |
| AVX | + | no data |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | no data | + |
Security technologies
Xeon E3-1270 v3 and Celeron 1017U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1270 v3 and Celeron 1017U are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1270 v3 and Celeron 1017U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3, DDR4 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1270 v3 and Celeron 1017U.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Xeon E3-1270 v3 outperforms Celeron 1017U by 386% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Xeon E3-1270 v3 outperforms Celeron 1017U by 383% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Xeon E3-1270 v3 outperforms Celeron 1017U by 345% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Xeon E3-1270 v3 outperforms Celeron 1017U by 736% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 4.71 | 0.97 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 8 | 2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 17 Watt |
Xeon E3-1270 v3 has a 385.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.
Celeron 1017U, on the other hand, has 370.6% lower power consumption.
The Xeon E3-1270 v3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 1017U in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon E3-1270 v3 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron 1017U is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1270 v3 and Celeron 1017U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
