Atom C3558 vs Xeon E3-1270 v3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1270 v3
2013
4 cores / 8 threads, 80 Watt
4.71
+200%

Xeon E3-1270 v3 outperforms Atom C3558 by a whopping 200% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1270 v3 and Atom C3558 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking12142023
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.520.52
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataIntel Atom
Architecture codenameHaswell-WS (2013)Goldmont (2016−2017)
Release date2 June 2013 (11 years ago)15 August 2017 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$370$86
Current price$225 (0.6x MSRP)$424 (4.9x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E3-1270 v3 has 385% better value for money than Atom C3558.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1270 v3 and Atom C3558 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz2.2 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)224 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)8 MB
L3 cache8192 KB (shared)8 MB
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size160 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data83 °C
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1270 v3 and Atom C3558 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1150FCBGA1310
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt16 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1270 v3 and Atom C3558. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX+no data
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssistno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1270 v3 and Atom C3558 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Key++
Identity Protection+no data
SGXno data-
OS Guard++
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1270 v3 and Atom C3558 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1270 v3 and Atom C3558. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR4: 2133
Maximum memory size32 GB256 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s29.871 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1270 v3 and Atom C3558.

PCIe version3.03
PCI Express lanes1612
USB revisionno data3
Total number of SATA portsno data12
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data12
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data2x10/2.5/1 GBE + 2x2.5/1 GBE

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1270 v3 4.71
+200%
Atom C3558 1.57

Xeon E3-1270 v3 outperforms Atom C3558 by 200% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E3-1270 v3 7284
+200%
Atom C3558 2426

Xeon E3-1270 v3 outperforms Atom C3558 by 200% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.71 1.57
Recency 2 June 2013 15 August 2017
Threads 8 4
Cost $370 $86
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 16 Watt

The Xeon E3-1270 v3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom C3558 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1270 v3 and Atom C3558, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3
Xeon E3-1270 v3
Intel Atom C3558
Atom C3558

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 1153 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1270 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate Atom C3558 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1270 v3 or Atom C3558, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.