Xeon w9-3595X vs E3-1268L v5

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1268L v5
2015
4 cores / 8 threads, 35 Watt
4.15
Xeon w9-3595X
2024
60 cores / 120 threads, 385 Watt
65.57
+1480%

Xeon w9-3595X outperforms Xeon E3-1268L v5 by a whopping 1480% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1268L v5 and Xeon w9-3595X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking140412
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.6420.20
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E3no data
Power efficiency10.7915.50
Architecture codenameSkylake-DT (2015)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date19 October 2015 (8 years ago)24 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$377$5,889

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon w9-3595X has 1132% better value for money than Xeon E3-1268L v5.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1268L v5 and Xeon w9-3595X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)60 (Hexaconta-Core)
Threads8120
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache256 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)112.5 MB
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size122 mm24x 477 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data81 °C
Number of transistors1,750 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1268L v5 and Xeon w9-3595X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
Socket1151FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt385 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1268L v5 and Xeon w9-3595X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1268L v5 and Xeon w9-3595X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDBno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1268L v5 and Xeon w9-3595X are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1268L v5 and Xeon w9-3595X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size64 GB4 TB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics P530N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1268L v5 and Xeon w9-3595X.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes16112

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1268L v5 4.15
Xeon w9-3595X 65.57
+1480%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1268L v5 6334
Xeon w9-3595X 100127
+1481%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.15 65.57
Recency 19 October 2015 24 August 2024
Physical cores 4 60
Threads 8 120
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 385 Watt

Xeon E3-1268L v5 has 1000% lower power consumption.

Xeon w9-3595X, on the other hand, has a 1480% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and 1400% more physical cores and 1400% more threads.

The Xeon w9-3595X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3-1268L v5 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1268L v5 and Xeon w9-3595X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1268L v5
Xeon E3-1268L v5
Intel Xeon w9-3595X
Xeon w9-3595X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Xeon E3-1268L v5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 19 votes

Rate Xeon w9-3595X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1268L v5 or Xeon w9-3595X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.