EPYC 9355 vs Xeon E3-1265L v3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1265L v3 and EPYC 9355 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1450not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.88no data
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency8.22no data
Architecture codenameHaswell-WS (2013−2014)Turin (2024)
Release date2 June 2013 (11 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$710$3,694

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1265L v3 and EPYC 9355 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads864
Base clock speed2.5 GHz3.55 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4.4 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache8192 KB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm4 nm
Die size160 mm28x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistors1,400 million66,520 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1265L v3 and EPYC 9355 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA1150SP5
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1265L v3 and EPYC 9355. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP+-
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1265L v3 and EPYC 9355 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1265L v3 and EPYC 9355 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1265L v3 and EPYC 9355. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel ProcessorsN/A
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1265L v3 and EPYC 9355 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1265L v3 and EPYC 9355.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes16128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 June 2013 10 October 2024
Physical cores 4 32
Threads 8 64
Chip lithography 22 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 280 Watt

Xeon E3-1265L v3 has 522.2% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9355, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 450% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E3-1265L v3 and EPYC 9355. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1265L v3 and EPYC 9355, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3
Xeon E3-1265L v3
AMD EPYC 9355
EPYC 9355

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 147 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1265L v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9355 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1265L v3 or EPYC 9355, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.