Celeron J3355 vs Xeon E3-1265L v3

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1265L v3
2013
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
4.06
+421%

Xeon E3-1265L v3 outperforms Celeron J3355 by a whopping 421% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1265L v3 and Celeron J3355 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14332642
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.830.02
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency8.237.11
Architecture codenameHaswell-WS (2013−2014)Apollo Lake (2014−2016)
Release date2 June 2013 (11 years ago)30 August 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$710$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E3-1265L v3 has 4050% better value for money than Celeron J3355.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1265L v3 and Celeron J3355 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz2.5 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data20
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache8192 KB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size160 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1265L v3 and Celeron J3355 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1150FCBGA1296
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1265L v3 and Celeron J3355. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP+-
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Smart Connectno data-
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
HD Audiono data+
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1265L v3 and Celeron J3355 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Key++
Identity Protection++
OS Guard+-
Anti-Theft+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1265L v3 and Celeron J3355 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
VT-ino data-
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1265L v3 and Celeron J3355. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size32 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel® ProcessorsIntel HD Graphics 500
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHz700 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12
InTru 3D+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1265L v3 and Celeron J3355 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E3-1265L v3 and Celeron J3355 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data+
OpenGLno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1265L v3 and Celeron J3355.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes166
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1265L v3 4.06
+421%
Celeron J3355 0.78

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1265L v3 6211
+419%
Celeron J3355 1197

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E3-1265L v3 1168
+329%
Celeron J3355 272

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E3-1265L v3 3563
+681%
Celeron J3355 456

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.06 0.78
Recency 2 June 2013 30 August 2016
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 10 Watt

Xeon E3-1265L v3 has a 420.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Celeron J3355, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 350% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E3-1265L v3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J3355 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1265L v3 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron J3355 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1265L v3 and Celeron J3355, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3
Xeon E3-1265L v3
Intel Celeron J3355
Celeron J3355

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 135 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1265L v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 58 votes

Rate Celeron J3355 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1265L v3 or Celeron J3355, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.