Xeon E5-2648L vs E3-1260L

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Xeon E3-1260L
2011
4 cores / 8 threads
2.61
Xeon E5-2648L
2012
8 cores / 16 threads
3.37
+29.1%

E5-2648L outperforms E3-1260L by 29% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Xeon E3-1260L and Xeon E5-2648L processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking16121456
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money0.330.49
Market segmentServerServer
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
Release date3 April 2011 (13 years ago)6 March 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$150no data
Current price$466 (3.1x MSRP)$555

Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5-2648L has 48% better value for money than Xeon E3-1260L.

Technical specs

Xeon E3-1260L and Xeon E5-2648L basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads816
Base clock speed2.4 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz2.3 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)20480 KB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size216 mm2435 mm2
Maximum core temperature59 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,160 million2,270 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1260L and Xeon E5-2648L compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketLGA11552011
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt70 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1260L and Xeon E5-2648L. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1260L and Xeon E5-2648L technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1260L and Xeon E5-2648L are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1260L and Xeon E5-2648L. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 2000no data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.25 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1260L and Xeon E5-2648L integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1260L and Xeon E5-2648L.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1260L 2.61
Xeon E5-2648L 3.37
+29.1%

E5-2648L outperforms E3-1260L by 29% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E3-1260L 4068
Xeon E5-2648L 5262
+29.4%

E5-2648L outperforms E3-1260L by 29% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 2.61 3.37
Recency 3 April 2011 6 March 2012
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 8 16
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 70 Watt

The Xeon E5-2648L is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3-1260L in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1260L and Xeon E5-2648L, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1260L
Xeon E3-1260L
Intel Xeon E5-2648L
Xeon E5-2648L

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 253 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1260L on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.6 7 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2648L on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1260L or Xeon E5-2648L, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.