Xeon E7340 vs E3-1245 v2

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Xeon E3-1245 v2
2012
4 cores / 8 threads
4.08

E7340 outperforms E3-1245 v2 by a minimal 4% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1245 v2 and Xeon E7340 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking13161283
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.73no data
Market segmentServerServer
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)no data
Release date14 May 2012 (12 years ago)1 July 2007 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$462no data
Current price$235 (0.5x MSRP)$50

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1245 v2 and Xeon E7340 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)no data
Threads8no data
Base clock speed3.4 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHzno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache8 MB (shared)8 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography22 nm65 nm
Die size160 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data66 °C
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage rangeno data1.0V-1.5V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1245 v2 and Xeon E7340 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1155PGA604,PPGA604
Power consumption (TDP)77 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1245 v2 and Xeon E7340. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX-no data
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching++
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
FSB parityno data+
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1245 v2 and Xeon E7340 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Identity Protection+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1245 v2 and Xeon E7340 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1245 v2 and Xeon E7340. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size32.77 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD P4000no data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.25 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1245 v2 and Xeon E7340 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1245 v2 and Xeon E7340.

PCIe version3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1245 v2 4.08
Xeon E7340 4.23
+3.7%

E7340 outperforms E3-1245 v2 by 4% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E3-1245 v2 6310
Xeon E7340 6544
+3.7%

E7340 outperforms E3-1245 v2 by 4% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.08 4.23
Recency 14 May 2012 1 July 2007
Chip lithography 22 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 77 Watt 80 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon E3-1245 v2 and Xeon E7340.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1245 v2 and Xeon E7340, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1245 v2
Xeon E3-1245 v2
Intel Xeon E7340
Xeon E7340

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 468 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1245 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

This processor has no user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon E7340 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1245 v2 or Xeon E7340, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.