Core i7-2677M vs Xeon E3-1240

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1240
2011
4 cores / 8 threads, 80 Watt
3.50
+182%

Xeon E3-1240 outperforms i7-2677M by a whopping 182% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1240 and Core i7-2677M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking14732233
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.54no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Core i7
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date3 April 2011 (13 years ago)27 June 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$209$317

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1240 and Core i7-2677M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.3 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz2.9 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size216 mm2149 mm2
Maximum core temperature69 °C100 °C
Number of transistors1,160 million624 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1240 and Core i7-2677M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
Socket1155BGA1023
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1240 and Core i7-2677M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data+
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1240 and Core i7-2677M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDBno data+
Anti-Theftno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1240 and Core i7-2677M are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1240 and Core i7-2677M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-1333
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/s21.335 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 3000

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1240 and Core i7-2677M.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes2016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1240 3.50
+182%
i7-2677M 1.24

Xeon E3-1240 outperforms Core i7-2677M by 182% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E3-1240 5412
+183%
i7-2677M 1912

Xeon E3-1240 outperforms Core i7-2677M by 183% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E3-1240 549
+13%
i7-2677M 486

Xeon E3-1240 outperforms Core i7-2677M by 13% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E3-1240 1947
+102%
i7-2677M 962

Xeon E3-1240 outperforms Core i7-2677M by 102% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.50 1.24
Recency 3 April 2011 27 June 2011
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 4
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 17 Watt

Xeon E3-1240 has a 182.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

i7-2677M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months, and 370.6% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E3-1240 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-2677M in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1240 is a server/workstation processor while Core i7-2677M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1240 and Core i7-2677M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1240
Xeon E3-1240
Intel Core i7-2677M
Core i7-2677M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 149 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 5 votes

Rate Core i7-2677M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1240 or Core i7-2677M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.