Core 2 Duo E6700 vs Xeon E3-1230 v3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1230 v3
2013
4 cores / 8 threads, 80 Watt
4.40
+588%

Xeon E3-1230 v3 outperforms Core 2 Duo E6700 by a whopping 588% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1230 v3 and Core 2 Duo E6700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking12682656
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.710.98
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesXeon (Desktop)Core 2 Duo (Desktop)
Architecture codenameHaswell-WS (2013)Conroe (2006−2007)
Release date2 June 2013 (11 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$240no data
Current price$130 (0.5x MSRP)$18

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E3-1230 v3 has 279% better value for money than Core 2 Duo E6700.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1230 v3 and Core 2 Duo E6700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed3.3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz2.66 GHz
Bus supportno data1066 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256K (per core)no data
L3 cache8 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography22 nm65 nm
Die size160 mm2no data
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1230 v3 and Core 2 Duo E6700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1150no data
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1230 v3 and Core 2 Duo E6700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1230 v3 and Core 2 Duo E6700 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+no data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1230 v3 and Core 2 Duo E6700 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1230 v3 and Core 2 Duo E6700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1230 v3 and Core 2 Duo E6700.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1230 v3 4.40
+588%
Core 2 Duo E6700 0.64

Xeon E3-1230 v3 outperforms Core 2 Duo E6700 by 588% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E3-1230 v3 6810
+588%
Core 2 Duo E6700 990

Xeon E3-1230 v3 outperforms Core 2 Duo E6700 by 588% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E3-1230 v3 1144
+258%
Core 2 Duo E6700 320

Xeon E3-1230 v3 outperforms Core 2 Duo E6700 by 258% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E3-1230 v3 3707
+579%
Core 2 Duo E6700 546

Xeon E3-1230 v3 outperforms Core 2 Duo E6700 by 579% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Xeon E3-1230 v3 5506
+103%
Core 2 Duo E6700 2710

Xeon E3-1230 v3 outperforms Core 2 Duo E6700 by 103% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Xeon E3-1230 v3 21708
+325%
Core 2 Duo E6700 5110

Xeon E3-1230 v3 outperforms Core 2 Duo E6700 by 325% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Xeon E3-1230 v3 7996
+240%
Core 2 Duo E6700 2354

Xeon E3-1230 v3 outperforms Core 2 Duo E6700 by 240% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.40 0.64
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 65 Watt

The Xeon E3-1230 v3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo E6700 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1230 v3 is a server/workstation processor while Core 2 Duo E6700 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1230 v3 and Core 2 Duo E6700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3
Xeon E3-1230 v3
Intel Core 2 Duo E6700
Core 2 Duo E6700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 511 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1230 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 77 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo E6700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1230 v3 or Core 2 Duo E6700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.