Athlon II X2 255 vs Xeon E3-1226 v3

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1226 v3
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 84 Watt
3.49
+372%
Athlon II X2 255
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.74

Xeon E3-1226 v3 outperforms Athlon II X2 255 by a whopping 372% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1226 v3 and Athlon II X2 255 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking15302664
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.310.02
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesXeon (Desktop)no data
Power efficiency3.931.08
Architecture codenameHaswell-WS (2013−2014)Regor (2009−2013)
Release date11 May 2014 (10 years ago)25 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$213$60

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E3-1226 v3 has 11450% better value for money than Athlon II X2 255.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1226 v3 and Athlon II X2 255 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.3 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3.1 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm45 nm
Die size160 mm2117 mm2
Number of transistors1,400 million410 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1226 v3 and Athlon II X2 255 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1150AM3
Power consumption (TDP)84 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1226 v3 and Athlon II X2 255. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP+-
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1226 v3 and Athlon II X2 255 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1226 v3 and Athlon II X2 255 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1226 v3 and Athlon II X2 255. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD P4600no data
Max video memory1.7 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHzno data
Execution Units20no data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1226 v3 and Athlon II X2 255 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
VGA+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E3-1226 v3 and Athlon II X2 255 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.43840x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort3840x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGA2880x1800@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E3-1226 v3 and Athlon II X2 255 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2no data
OpenGL4.3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1226 v3 and Athlon II X2 255.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1226 v3 3.49
+372%
Athlon II X2 255 0.74

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1226 v3 5543
+372%
Athlon II X2 255 1175

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E3-1226 v3 1155
+294%
Athlon II X2 255 293

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E3-1226 v3 3306
+720%
Athlon II X2 255 403

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.49 0.74
Recency 11 May 2014 25 January 2010
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 84 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon E3-1226 v3 has a 371.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 104.5% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon II X2 255, on the other hand, has 29.2% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E3-1226 v3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon II X2 255 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1226 v3 is a server/workstation processor while Athlon II X2 255 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1226 v3 and Athlon II X2 255, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1226 v3
Xeon E3-1226 v3
AMD Athlon II X2 255
Athlon II X2 255

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 80 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1226 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 175 votes

Rate Athlon II X2 255 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1226 v3 or Athlon II X2 255, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.