Core 2 Extreme X9000 vs Xeon E3-1225 v5

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1225 v5
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 80 Watt
3.86
+444%
Core 2 Extreme X9000
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 44 Watt
0.71

Xeon E3-1225 v5 outperforms Core 2 Extreme X9000 by a whopping 444% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1225 v5 and Core 2 Extreme X9000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking13902604
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.74no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon E3Intel Core 2 Extreme
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date19 October 2015 (8 years ago)10 January 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$224$851
Current price$503 (2.2x MSRP)$450 (0.5x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1225 v5 and Core 2 Extreme X9000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.3 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/s800 MHz
L1 cache256 KB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB6 MB
L3 cache8 MB6 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die size122 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistorsno data410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage rangeno data1V-1.275V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1225 v5 and Core 2 Extreme X9000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1151PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt44 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1225 v5 and Core 2 Extreme X9000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology--
TSX+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-
StatusLaunchedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1225 v5 and Core 2 Extreme X9000 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+no data
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1225 v5 and Core 2 Extreme X9000 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1225 v5 and Core 2 Extreme X9000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR3L-1333, DDR3L-1600no data
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.1 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics P530no data
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.15 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1225 v5 and Core 2 Extreme X9000 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E3-1225 v5 and Core 2 Extreme X9000 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E3-1225 v5 and Core 2 Extreme X9000 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1225 v5 and Core 2 Extreme X9000.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1225 v5 3.86
+444%
Core 2 Extreme X9000 0.71

Xeon E3-1225 v5 outperforms Core 2 Extreme X9000 by 444% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E3-1225 v5 5967
+443%
Core 2 Extreme X9000 1099

Xeon E3-1225 v5 outperforms Core 2 Extreme X9000 by 443% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E3-1225 v5 1226
+191%
Core 2 Extreme X9000 421

Xeon E3-1225 v5 outperforms Core 2 Extreme X9000 by 191% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E3-1225 v5 3428
+377%
Core 2 Extreme X9000 719

Xeon E3-1225 v5 outperforms Core 2 Extreme X9000 by 377% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.86 0.71
Recency 19 October 2015 10 January 2008
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Cost $224 $851
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 44 Watt

The Xeon E3-1225 v5 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Extreme X9000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1225 v5 is a server/workstation processor while Core 2 Extreme X9000 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1225 v5 and Core 2 Extreme X9000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5
Xeon E3-1225 v5
Intel Core 2 Extreme X9000
Core 2 Extreme X9000

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 51 vote

Rate Xeon E3-1225 v5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 40 votes

Rate Core 2 Extreme X9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1225 v5 or Core 2 Extreme X9000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.