Xeon D-2712T vs E-2314

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E-2314
2021
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
5.27
+1.9%

E-2314 outperforms D-2712T by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E-2314 and Xeon D-2712T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking11181137
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation30.83no data
Market segmentServerServer
Architecture codenameRocket Lake-E (2021)no data
Release date8 September 2021 (2 years ago)1 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Current price$217 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E-2314 and Xeon D-2712T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed2.8 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz3 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)no data
L3 cache8 MB (shared)15 MB
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E-2314 and Xeon D-2712T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1200FCBGA2579
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E-2314 and Xeon D-2712T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssistno data-
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
StatusLaunchedLaunched

Security technologies

Xeon E-2314 and Xeon D-2712T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+no data
SGXYes with Intel® SPSYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E-2314 and Xeon D-2712T are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E-2314 and Xeon D-2712T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4
Maximum memory size128 GB1 TB
Max memory channels24
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E-2314 and Xeon D-2712T.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanes2032
USB revisionno data3.0
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data24
Number of USB portsno data4
Integrated LANno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E-2314 5.27
+1.9%
Xeon D-2712T 5.17

E-2314 outperforms D-2712T by 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E-2314 8146
+2%
Xeon D-2712T 7990

E-2314 outperforms D-2712T by 2% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.27 5.17
Recency 8 September 2021 1 January 2022
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon E-2314 and Xeon D-2712T.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E-2314 and Xeon D-2712T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E-2314
Xeon E-2314
Intel Xeon D-2712T
Xeon D-2712T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 7 votes

Rate Xeon E-2314 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon D-2712T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E-2314 or Xeon D-2712T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.