Core i7-11700T vs Xeon E-2224G
Aggregate performance score
i7-11700T outperforms Xeon E-2224G by a whopping 101% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon E-2224G and Core i7-11700T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1169 | 725 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 10.45 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Xeon E | no data |
| Architecture codename | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) | Rocket Lake (2021) |
| Release date | 27 May 2019 (5 years ago) | 16 March 2021 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $213 | no data |
| Current price | $368 (1.7x MSRP) | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon E-2224G and Core i7-11700T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| Bus support | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 256K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 126 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 69 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E-2224G and Core i7-11700T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | Socket H4 | 1200 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 71 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E-2224G and Core i7-11700T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | + | + |
Security technologies
Xeon E-2224G and Core i7-11700T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E-2224G and Core i7-11700T are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E-2224G and Core i7-11700T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 42.671 GB/s | 50 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | Intel UHD Graphics 750 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E-2224G and Core i7-11700T.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Core i7-11700T outperforms Xeon E-2224G by 101% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Core i7-11700T outperforms Xeon E-2224G by 101% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Core i7-11700T outperforms Xeon E-2224G by 14% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Core i7-11700T outperforms Xeon E-2224G by 53% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 4.93 | 9.92 |
| Recency | 27 May 2019 | 16 March 2021 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 8 |
| Threads | 4 | 16 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 71 Watt | 35 Watt |
i7-11700T has a 101.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and 102.9% lower power consumption.
The Core i7-11700T is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E-2224G in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon E-2224G is a server/workstation processor while Core i7-11700T is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E-2224G and Core i7-11700T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
