Phenom II X3 P820 vs Xeon E-2176G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E-2176G
2018
6 cores / 12 threads, 80 Watt
8.77
+1190%

Xeon E-2176G outperforms Phenom II X3 P820 by a whopping 1190% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E-2176G and Phenom II X3 P820 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking8162630
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.26no data
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon (Desktop)3x AMD Phenom II
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-ER (2018)Champlain (2010−2011)
Release date1 September 2018 (5 years ago)12 May 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$367no data
Current price$621 (1.7x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E-2176G and Phenom II X3 P820 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)3 (Tri-Core)
Threads123
Base clock speed3.7 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.7 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus supportno data3600 MHz
L1 cache384 KB384 KB
L2 cache1.5 MB1.5 MB
L3 cache12 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die size149 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E-2176G and Phenom II X3 P820 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1151S1
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E-2176G and Phenom II X3 P820. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2integrated DDR3 Memory Controller, Virtualization, AMD64, Advanced Virus Protection, SSE(1,2,3,4a)
AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data
VirusProtectno data+
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
StatusLaunchedno data

Security technologies

Xeon E-2176G and Phenom II X3 P820 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+no data
SGXYes with both Intel® SPS and Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E-2176G and Phenom II X3 P820 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E-2176G and Phenom II X3 P820. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth41.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics P630no data
Max video memory128 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E-2176G and Phenom II X3 P820 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E-2176G and Phenom II X3 P820 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2160@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E-2176G and Phenom II X3 P820 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E-2176G and Phenom II X3 P820.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E-2176G 8.77
+1190%
Phenom II X3 P820 0.68

Xeon E-2176G outperforms Phenom II X3 P820 by 1190% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Xeon E-2176G 7369
+373%
Phenom II X3 P820 1560

Xeon E-2176G outperforms Phenom II X3 P820 by 373% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Xeon E-2176G 39053
+837%
Phenom II X3 P820 4169

Xeon E-2176G outperforms Phenom II X3 P820 by 837% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Xeon E-2176G 11719
+474%
Phenom II X3 P820 2043

Xeon E-2176G outperforms Phenom II X3 P820 by 474% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Xeon E-2176G 15
+847%
Phenom II X3 P820 2

Xeon E-2176G outperforms Phenom II X3 P820 by 847% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.77 0.68
Recency 1 September 2018 12 May 2010
Physical cores 6 3
Threads 12 3
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 25 Watt

The Xeon E-2176G is our recommended choice as it beats the Phenom II X3 P820 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E-2176G is a server/workstation processor while Phenom II X3 P820 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E-2176G and Phenom II X3 P820, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E-2176G
Xeon E-2176G
AMD Phenom II X3 P820
Phenom II X3 P820

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 15 votes

Rate Xeon E-2176G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 48 votes

Rate Phenom II X3 P820 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E-2176G or Phenom II X3 P820, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.