Apple M1 Pro vs Xeon D-2187NT

Aggregate performance score

Xeon D-2187NT
2018
16 cores / 32 threads, 110 Watt
11.38
+5.2%
Apple M1 Pro
2021
10 cores / 10 threads, 2064 Watt
10.82

Xeon D-2187NT outperforms Apple M1 Pro by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon D-2187NT and Apple M1 Pro processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking686713
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.04no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon DApple M-Series
Power efficiency9.79no data
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)no data
Release date7 February 2018 (6 years ago)18 October 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,989no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon D-2187NT and Apple M1 Pro basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads3210
Base clock speed2 GHz2.064 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.22 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache1 MB2.9 MB
L2 cache16 MB28 MB
L3 cache22 MB24 MB
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Number of transistorsno data33700 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon D-2187NT and Apple M1 Pro compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFCBGA2518no data
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt2064 ‑ 3220 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon D-2187NT and Apple M1 Pro. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
QuickAssist+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Xeon D-2187NT and Apple M1 Pro technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon D-2187NT and Apple M1 Pro are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon D-2187NT and Apple M1 Pro. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data
Maximum memory size512 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon D-2187NT and Apple M1 Pro.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes32no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon D-2187NT 11.38
+5.2%
Apple M1 Pro 10.82

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon D-2187NT 18070
+5.1%
Apple M1 Pro 17191

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.38 10.82
Recency 7 February 2018 18 October 2021
Physical cores 16 10
Threads 32 10
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 2064 Watt

Xeon D-2187NT has a 5.2% higher aggregate performance score, 60% more physical cores and 220% more threads, and 1776.4% lower power consumption.

Apple M1 Pro, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon D-2187NT and Apple M1 Pro.

Be aware that Xeon D-2187NT is a server/workstation processor while Apple M1 Pro is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon D-2187NT and Apple M1 Pro, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon D-2187NT
Xeon D-2187NT
Apple M1 Pro
M1 Pro

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Xeon D-2187NT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 406 votes

Rate Apple M1 Pro on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon D-2187NT or Apple M1 Pro, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.