Core i7 vs Xeon D-1622
Aggregate performance score
Xeon D-1622 outperforms Core i7 by an impressive 63% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon D-1622 and Core i7 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1352 | 1680 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 2.45 | 5.34 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Xeon D | no data |
| Architecture codename | Broadwell (2015−2019) | no data |
| Release date | 2 April 2019 (5 years ago) | 1 October 2023 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $170 | no data |
| Current price | $1182 (7x MSRP) | $269 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Core i7 has 118% better value for money than Xeon D-1622.
Detailed specifications
Xeon D-1622 and Core i7 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | no data |
| Threads | 8 | no data |
| Base clock speed | 2.6 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | 6 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | no data |
| Die size | 246.24 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 3200 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon D-1622 and Core i7 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | FCBGA1667 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | no data |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon D-1622 and Core i7. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® AVX2 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | no data |
| AVX | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| QuickAssist | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| TSX | + | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | no data |
| GPIO | + | no data |
| AMT | SPS 3.0 | no data |
| Status | Launched | no data |
| Quiet System | - | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon D-1622 and Core i7 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
| Secure Key | + | no data |
| SGX | - | no data |
| OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon D-1622 and Core i7 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon D-1622 and Core i7. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR3 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 34.124 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon D-1622 and Core i7.
| PCIe version | 2.0/3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 32 | no data |
| USB revision | 2.0/3.0 | no data |
| Total number of SATA ports | 6 | no data |
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 6 | no data |
| Number of USB ports | 8 | no data |
| Integrated LAN | - | no data |
| UART | + | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Xeon D-1622 outperforms Core i7 by 63% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Core i7 outperforms Xeon D-1622 by 23% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 4.01 | 2.46 |
| Recency | 2 April 2019 | 1 October 2023 |
The Xeon D-1622 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7 in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon D-1622 is a server/workstation processor while Core i7 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon D-1622 and Core i7, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
