EPYC 9335 vs Xeon D-1612

Primary details

Comparing Xeon D-1612 and EPYC 9335 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Dno data
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Turin (2024)
Release date2 April 2019 (5 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,178

Detailed specifications

Xeon D-1612 and EPYC 9335 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads864
Base clock speed1.5 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz4.4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Multiplier15no data
L1 cache256 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die size246.24 mm24x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors3200 Million33,260 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon D-1612 and EPYC 9335 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCBGA1667SP5
Power consumption (TDP)22 Watt210 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon D-1612 and EPYC 9335. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
QuickAssist-no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
GPIO+no data
AMTSPS 3.0no data
Quiet System-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon D-1612 and EPYC 9335 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon D-1612 and EPYC 9335 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon D-1612 and EPYC 9335. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.124 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon D-1612 and EPYC 9335.

PCIe version2.0/3.05.0
PCI Express lanes32128
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports6no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports6no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 April 2019 10 October 2024
Physical cores 4 32
Threads 8 64
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 22 Watt 210 Watt

Xeon D-1612 has 854.5% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9335, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Xeon D-1612 and EPYC 9335. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon D-1612 and EPYC 9335, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon D-1612
Xeon D-1612
AMD EPYC 9335
EPYC 9335

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon D-1612 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9335 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon D-1612 or EPYC 9335, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.