Xeon Gold 5512U vs D-1581

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon D-1581
2016
16 cores / 32 threads, 65 Watt
8.59
Xeon Gold 5512U
2023
28 cores / 56 threads, 185 Watt
38.91
+353%

Gold 5512U outperforms D-1581 by a whopping 353% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon D-1581 and Xeon Gold 5512U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking83168
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.73no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Dno data
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Emerald Rapids
Release date24 February 2016 (8 years ago)1 October 2023 (less than a year ago)
Current price$728 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon D-1581 and Xeon Gold 5512U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)28 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads3256
Base clock speed1.8 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache1.5 MB (per core)52.5 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size306.18 mm22x 763 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data89 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)80 °C89 °C
Number of transistors3,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon D-1581 and Xeon Gold 5512U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1667FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt185 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon D-1581 and Xeon Gold 5512U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
GPIO+no data
StatusLaunchedLaunched

Security technologies

Xeon D-1581 and Xeon Gold 5512U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon D-1581 and Xeon Gold 5512U are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon D-1581 and Xeon Gold 5512U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR3DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400
Maximum memory size128 GB4 TB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth34.124 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon D-1581 and Xeon Gold 5512U.

PCIe version2.0/3.05.0
PCI Express lanes3280
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports6no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN+no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon D-1581 8.59
Xeon Gold 5512U 38.91
+353%

Gold 5512U outperforms D-1581 by 353% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon D-1581 13282
Xeon Gold 5512U 60187
+353%

Gold 5512U outperforms D-1581 by 353% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.59 38.91
Recency 24 February 2016 1 October 2023
Physical cores 16 28
Threads 32 56
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 185 Watt

The Xeon Gold 5512U is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon D-1581 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon D-1581 and Xeon Gold 5512U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon D-1581
Xeon D-1581
Intel Xeon Gold 5512U
Xeon Gold 5512U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 17 votes

Rate Xeon D-1581 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate Xeon Gold 5512U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon D-1581 or Xeon Gold 5512U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.