Xeon W3670 vs D-1528
Aggregate performance score
D-1528 outperforms W3670 by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon D-1528 and Xeon W3670 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1301 | 1339 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.51 | 3.79 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Series | Intel Xeon D | no data |
| Architecture codename | Broadwell (2015−2019) | Gulftown (2010−2011) |
| Release date | 1 November 2015 (8 years ago) | 29 August 2010 (13 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $320 | $295 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Xeon W3670 has 643% better value for money than Xeon D-1528.
Detailed specifications
Xeon D-1528 and Xeon W3670 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 1.9 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.9 GHz | 3.46 GHz |
| L1 cache | 384 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1.5 MB | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 9 MB | 12 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 246.24 mm2 | 239 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 68 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 80 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 3200 Million | 1,170 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon D-1528 and Xeon W3670 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1667 | 1366 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 130 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon D-1528 and Xeon W3670. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | + | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon D-1528 and Xeon W3670 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon D-1528 and Xeon W3670 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon D-1528 and Xeon W3670. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3, DDR4 Dual-channel | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 34.124 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon D-1528 and Xeon W3670.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 24 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
D-1528 outperforms W3670 by 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
D-1528 outperforms W3670 by 5% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 4.39 | 4.16 |
| Recency | 1 November 2015 | 29 August 2010 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 130 Watt |
Xeon D-1528 has a 5.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 271.4% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon D-1528 and Xeon W3670.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon D-1528 and Xeon W3670, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
