Phenom II X4 850 vs Xeon D-1520

Aggregate performance score

Xeon D-1520
2015
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
3.18
+108%

Xeon D-1520 outperforms Phenom II X4 850 by a whopping 108% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon D-1520 and Phenom II X4 850 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking15302040
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.402.32
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon Dno data
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Propus (2009−2011)
Release date9 March 2015 (9 years ago)1 June 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199$111
Current price$595 (3x MSRP)$69 (0.6x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Phenom II X4 850 has 480% better value for money than Xeon D-1520.

Detailed specifications

Xeon D-1520 and Phenom II X4 850 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed2.2 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz3.3 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache1.5 MB (per core)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die size246.24 mm2169 mm2
Maximum core temperature80 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)80 °Cno data
Number of transistors3,200 million300 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon D-1520 and Phenom II X4 850 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1667AM3
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon D-1520 and Phenom II X4 850. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
GPIO+no data
StatusLaunchedno data

Security technologies

Xeon D-1520 and Phenom II X4 850 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon D-1520 and Phenom II X4 850 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon D-1520 and Phenom II X4 850. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.124 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon D-1520 and Phenom II X4 850.

PCIe version2.0/3.02.0
PCI Express lanes32no data
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports6no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN+no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon D-1520 3.18
+108%
Phenom II X4 850 1.53

Xeon D-1520 outperforms Phenom II X4 850 by 108% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon D-1520 4917
+108%
Phenom II X4 850 2361

Xeon D-1520 outperforms Phenom II X4 850 by 108% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.18 1.53
Recency 9 March 2015 1 June 2011
Threads 8 4
Cost $199 $111
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 95 Watt

The Xeon D-1520 is our recommended choice as it beats the Phenom II X4 850 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon D-1520 is a server/workstation processor while Phenom II X4 850 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon D-1520 and Phenom II X4 850, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon D-1520
Xeon D-1520
AMD Phenom II X4 850
Phenom II X4 850

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon D-1520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 74 votes

Rate Phenom II X4 850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon D-1520 or Phenom II X4 850, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.