i5-14600KF vs Xeon Bronze 3408U

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Bronze 3408U
2023
8 cores / 8 threads, 125 Watt
6.24
Core i5-14600KF
2023
14 cores / 20 threads, 125 Watt
25.67
+311%

Core i5-14600KF outperforms Xeon Bronze 3408U by a whopping 311% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Bronze 3408U and Core i5-14600KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1088198
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation27.3067.26
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency4.5518.73
Architecture codenameSapphire Rapids (2023−2024)Raptor Lake-R (2023−2024)
Release date10 January 2023 (1 year ago)17 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$425$294

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i5-14600KF has 146% better value for money than Xeon Bronze 3408U.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Bronze 3408U and Core i5-14600KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads820
Base clock speed1.8 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed1.9 GHz5.3 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache22.5 MB24 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data257 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)79 °C72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Bronze 3408U and Core i5-14600KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA4677FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Bronze 3408U and Core i5-14600KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX++
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon Bronze 3408U and Core i5-14600KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Bronze 3408U and Core i5-14600KF are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Bronze 3408U and Core i5-14600KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4000DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TB192 GB
Max memory channels82
Maximum memory bandwidthno data89.6 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Bronze 3408U and Core i5-14600KF.

PCIe version4.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes8016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Bronze 3408U 6.24
i5-14600KF 25.67
+311%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Bronze 3408U 9557
i5-14600KF 39281
+311%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.24 25.67
Recency 10 January 2023 17 October 2023
Physical cores 8 14
Threads 8 20

i5-14600KF has a 311.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 months, and 75% more physical cores and 150% more threads.

The Core i5-14600KF is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Bronze 3408U in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Bronze 3408U is a server/workstation processor while Core i5-14600KF is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Bronze 3408U and Core i5-14600KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Bronze 3408U
Xeon Bronze 3408U
Intel Core i5-14600KF
Core i5-14600KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 2 votes

Rate Xeon Bronze 3408U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 761 vote

Rate Core i5-14600KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Bronze 3408U or Core i5-14600KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.