Xeon Platinum 8163 vs Bronze 3106
Primary details
Comparing Xeon Bronze 3106 and Xeon Platinum 8163 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1490 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 4.16 | no data |
Market segment | Server | Server |
Series | Intel Xeon Bronze | Intel Xeon Platinum |
Power efficiency | 4.03 | no data |
Architecture codename | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
Release date | 11 July 2017 (7 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $306 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon Bronze 3106 and Xeon Platinum 8163 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
Threads | 8 | 48 |
Base clock speed | 1.7 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
Multiplier | 17 | 25 |
L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 1.5 MB |
L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 24 MB |
L3 cache | 11 MB (shared) | 33 MB |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 77 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 8,000 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Bronze 3106 and Xeon Platinum 8163 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 (Multiprocessor) | 8 (Multiprocessor) |
Socket | FCLGA3647 | Socket P |
Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | no data |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Bronze 3106 and Xeon Platinum 8163. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 | no data |
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | + | + |
vPro | + | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Speed Shift | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
TSX | + | + |
Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | - | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon Bronze 3106 and Xeon Platinum 8163 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | + |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Bronze 3106 and Xeon Platinum 8163 are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | + |
VT-x | + | + |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Bronze 3106 and Xeon Platinum 8163. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4-2133 | DDR4-2666 |
Maximum memory size | 768 GB | 768 GB |
Max memory channels | 6 | 6 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 102.403 GB/s | 128.001 GB/s |
ECC memory support | + | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Bronze 3106 and Xeon Platinum 8163.
PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 48 | 48 |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 8 | 24 |
Threads | 8 | 48 |
Xeon Platinum 8163 has 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Xeon Bronze 3106 and Xeon Platinum 8163. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Bronze 3106 and Xeon Platinum 8163, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.