Ryzen 5 8400F vs Xeon Bronze 3104

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Bronze 3104
2017
6 cores / 6 threads, 85 Watt
2.79
Ryzen 5 8400F
2024
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
15.10
+441%

Ryzen 5 8400F outperforms Xeon Bronze 3104 by a whopping 441% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Bronze 3104 and Ryzen 5 8400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1677459
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.1059.85
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon Bronzeno data
Power efficiency3.1121.98
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Phoenix (2023−2024)
Release date11 July 2017 (7 years ago)1 April 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$213$170

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 5 8400F has 1360% better value for money than Xeon Bronze 3104.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Bronze 3104 and Ryzen 5 8400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads612
Base clock speed1.7 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz4.7 GHz
Multiplier17no data
L1 cache384 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache6 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache8.25 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data178 mm2
Maximum core temperature78 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Bronze 3104 and Ryzen 5 8400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647AM5
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Bronze 3104 and Ryzen 5 8400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon Bronze 3104 and Ryzen 5 8400F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Bronze 3104 and Ryzen 5 8400F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Bronze 3104 and Ryzen 5 8400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2133DDR5
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth102.403 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Bronze 3104 and Ryzen 5 8400F.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes4820

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Bronze 3104 2.79
Ryzen 5 8400F 15.10
+441%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Bronze 3104 4437
Ryzen 5 8400F 23988
+441%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.79 15.10
Recency 11 July 2017 1 April 2024
Threads 6 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 65 Watt

Ryzen 5 8400F has a 441.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more threads, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 30.8% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 8400F is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Bronze 3104 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Bronze 3104 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 8400F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Bronze 3104 and Ryzen 5 8400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Bronze 3104
Xeon Bronze 3104
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F
Ryzen 5 8400F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.2 15 votes

Rate Xeon Bronze 3104 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 233 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 8400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Bronze 3104 or Ryzen 5 8400F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.