Celeron M U3600 vs Xeon Bronze 3104

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1931not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.44no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon BronzeIntel Celeron M
Power efficiency1.24no data
DesignerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Arrandale (2010−2011)
Release date11 July 2017 (8 years ago)18 December 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$213no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon Bronze 3104 and Celeron M U3600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads62
Base clock speed1.7 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz1.2 GHz
Bus rateno data2500 MHz
Multiplier17no data
L1 cache384 KBno data
L2 cache6 MB512 KB
L3 cache8.25 MB2 MB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data81+114 mm2
Maximum core temperature78 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data382+177 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Bronze 3104 and Celeron M U3600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA3647BGA1288
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Bronze 3104 and Celeron M U3600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Xeon Bronze 3104 and Celeron M U3600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Bronze 3104 and Celeron M U3600 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Bronze 3104 and Celeron M U3600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2133DDR3
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth102.403 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Bronze 3104 and Celeron M U3600.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes48no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 July 2017 18 December 2010
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 6 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 18 Watt

Xeon Bronze 3104 has an age advantage of 6 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron M U3600, on the other hand, has 372.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Intel Xeon Bronze 3104 and Intel Celeron M U3600. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon Bronze 3104 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron M U3600 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Bronze 3104
Xeon Bronze 3104
Intel Celeron M U3600
Celeron M U3600

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.2 15 votes

Rate Xeon Bronze 3104 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron M U3600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon Bronze 3104 and Celeron M U3600, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.