i7-4940MX Extreme Edition vs Xeon 6766E
Primary details
Comparing Xeon 6766E and Core i7-4940MX Extreme Edition processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Core i7EE |
| Architecture codename | Sierra Forest (2024) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
| Release date | 3 June 2024 (less than a year ago) | 19 January 2014 (10 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon 6766E and Core i7-4940MX Extreme Edition basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 144 | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 144 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 1.9 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | DMI |
| Bus rate | no data | 5 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 31 |
| L1 cache | 96 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 4 MB (per module) | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 108 MB (shared) | 8 MB |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 22 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 84 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon 6766E and Core i7-4940MX Extreme Edition compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | no data |
| Socket | 4710 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 57 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 6766E and Core i7-4940MX Extreme Edition. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon 6766E and Core i7-4940MX Extreme Edition technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 6766E and Core i7-4940MX Extreme Edition are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 6766E and Core i7-4940MX Extreme Edition. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 32 GB |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 6766E and Core i7-4940MX Extreme Edition.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 88 | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 3 June 2024 | 19 January 2014 |
| Physical cores | 144 | 4 |
| Threads | 144 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 57 Watt |
Xeon 6766E has an age advantage of 10 years, 3500% more physical cores and 1700% more threads, and a 340% more advanced lithography process.
i7-4940MX Extreme Edition, on the other hand, has 338.6% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon 6766E and Core i7-4940MX Extreme Edition. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon 6766E is a server/workstation processor while Core i7-4940MX Extreme Edition is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon 6766E and Core i7-4940MX Extreme Edition, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
