Ultra 9 288V vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
2024
12 cores / 24 threads, 28 Watt
22.74
+81.3%
Core Ultra 9 288V
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 30 Watt
12.54

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 outperforms Core Ultra 9 288V by an impressive 81% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Core Ultra 9 288V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking232618
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Power efficiency75.4338.82
Architecture codenameStrix Point (2024)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release dateJuly 2024 (recently)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Core Ultra 9 288V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads248
Base clock speed2 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rate54 MHz37 MHz
L1 cache80 KB (per core)192 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache24 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography4 nm3 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Core Ultra 9 288V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP8Intel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt30 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Core Ultra 9 288V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4Ano data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Core Ultra 9 288V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Core Ultra 9 288V are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Core Ultra 9 288V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon 890MArc 140V

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Core Ultra 9 288V.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes164

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 22.74
+81.3%
Ultra 9 288V 12.54

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 35448
+81.4%
Ultra 9 288V 19542

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 16380
+31%
Ultra 9 288V 12505

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.74 12.54
Physical cores 12 8
Threads 24 8
Chip lithography 4 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 30 Watt

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 has a 81.3% higher aggregate performance score, 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and 7.1% lower power consumption.

Ultra 9 288V, on the other hand, has a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Ultra 9 288V in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Core Ultra 9 288V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
Core Ultra 9 288V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 86 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 10 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 288V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 or Core Ultra 9 288V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.