Ultra 9 288V vs Ryzen 9 9900X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 9900X
2024
12 cores / 24 threads, 120 Watt
34.55
+176%
Core Ultra 9 288V
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 30 Watt
12.52

Ryzen 9 9900X outperforms Core Ultra 9 288V by a whopping 176% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 9900X and Core Ultra 9 288V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking108623
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation66.91no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency27.2539.50
Architecture codenameGranite Ridge (2024)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date15 August 2024 (less than a year ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 9900X and Core Ultra 9 288V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads248
Base clock speed4.4 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed5.6 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rateno data37 MHz
L1 cache80 KB (per core)192 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography4 nm3 nm
Die size2x 70.6 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature95 °C100 °C
Number of transistors16,630 millionno data
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 9900X and Core Ultra 9 288V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM5Intel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt30 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 9900X and Core Ultra 9 288V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4Ano data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen 9 9900X and Core Ultra 9 288V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 9900X and Core Ultra 9 288V are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 9900X and Core Ultra 9 288V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon GraphicsArc 140V

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 9900X and Core Ultra 9 288V.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes244

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 9900X 34.55
+176%
Ultra 9 288V 12.52

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 9 9900X 54888
+176%
Ultra 9 288V 19895

CrossMark Overall

Ryzen 9 9900X 2289
+38.4%
Ultra 9 288V 1654

WebXPRT 4 Overall

Ryzen 9 9900X 349
+2%
Ultra 9 288V 342

Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core

Ryzen 9 9900X 20380
+84.1%
Ultra 9 288V 11069

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.55 12.52
Recency 15 August 2024 24 September 2024
Physical cores 12 8
Threads 24 8
Chip lithography 4 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 30 Watt

Ryzen 9 9900X has a 176% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

Ultra 9 288V, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 month, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 300% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 9 9900X is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Ultra 9 288V in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 9 9900X is a desktop processor while Core Ultra 9 288V is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 9900X and Core Ultra 9 288V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 9900X
Ryzen 9 9900X
Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
Core Ultra 9 288V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 188 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 9900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 35 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 288V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 9900X or Core Ultra 9 288V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.