Athlon 64 X2 5200+ vs Xeon 5148
Aggregate performance score
Xeon 5148 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 5200+ by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon 5148 and Athlon 64 X2 5200+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2698 | 2736 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.05 | 3.54 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Architecture codename | Woodcrest (2006) | Windsor (2006−2009) |
| Release date | June 2006 (18 years ago) | September 2006 (17 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $9 | no data |
| Current price | $63 (7x MSRP) | $112 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Athlon 64 X2 5200+ has 16% better value for money than Xeon 5148.
Detailed specifications
Xeon 5148 and Athlon 64 X2 5200+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.33 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | 0 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 512K |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | no data | 220 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 154 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon 5148 and Athlon 64 X2 5200+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 771 | AM2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 89 Watt |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 5148 and Athlon 64 X2 5200+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Xeon 5148 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 5200+ by 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Xeon 5148 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 5200+ by 8% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.59 | 0.55 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 89 Watt |
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon 5148 and Athlon 64 X2 5200+.
Be aware that Xeon 5148 is a server/workstation processor while Athlon 64 X2 5200+ is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon 5148 and Athlon 64 X2 5200+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
