EPYC 9274F vs Xeon 5120

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon 5120
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.48
EPYC 9274F
2022
24 cores / 48 threads, 320 Watt
46.32
+9550%

EPYC 9274F outperforms Xeon 5120 by a whopping 9550% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon 5120 and EPYC 9274F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking291342
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data12.71
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiency0.7013.70
Architecture codenameWoodcrest (2006)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release dateJune 2006 (18 years ago)10 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$45$3,060

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon 5120 and EPYC 9274F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads248
Base clock speed1.86 GHz4.05 GHz
Boost clock speed1.87 GHz4.3 GHz
Multiplierno data40.5
L1 cache0 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache4 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die sizeno data8x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature65 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data52,560 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage rangeB2=1.0V-1.5V, G0=.85V-1.5Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon 5120 and EPYC 9274F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketLGA771SP5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt320 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 5120 and EPYC 9274F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon 5120 and EPYC 9274F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 5120 and EPYC 9274F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data
EPT-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 5120 and EPYC 9274F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data460.8 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 5120 and EPYC 9274F.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon 5120 0.48
EPYC 9274F 46.32
+9550%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon 5120 763
EPYC 9274F 73582
+9544%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.48 46.32
Physical cores 2 24
Threads 2 48
Chip lithography 65 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 320 Watt

Xeon 5120 has 392.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9274F, on the other hand, has a 9550% higher aggregate performance score, 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9274F is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon 5120 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon 5120 and EPYC 9274F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon 5120
Xeon 5120
AMD EPYC 9274F
EPYC 9274F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 12 votes

Rate Xeon 5120 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 7 votes

Rate EPYC 9274F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon 5120 or EPYC 9274F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.