Celeron N4020 vs Xeon 5148

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon 5148
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 40 Watt
0.57
Celeron N4020
2019
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.97
+70.2%

Celeron N4020 outperforms Xeon 5148 by an impressive 70% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon 5148 and Celeron N4020 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28072476
Place by popularitynot in top-10083
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.05no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Gemini Lake
Power efficiency1.3515.30
Architecture codenameWoodcrest (2006)Gemini Lake Refresh (2019)
Release dateJune 2006 (18 years ago)4 November 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$9no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon 5148 and Celeron N4020 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.33 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus rateno data15 MHz
L1 cache0 KBno data
L2 cache4 MB4 MB
L3 cache0 KB4 MB
Chip lithography65 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon 5148 and Celeron N4020 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket771FCBGA1090
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 5148 and Celeron N4020. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

Xeon 5148 and Celeron N4020 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 5148 and Celeron N4020 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 5148 and Celeron N4020. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 600
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data650 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon 5148 and Celeron N4020 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon 5148 and Celeron N4020 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2160@30Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon 5148 and Celeron N4020 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 5148 and Celeron N4020.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data6
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon 5148 0.57
Celeron N4020 0.97
+70.2%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon 5148 912
Celeron N4020 1548
+69.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.57 0.97
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 6 Watt

Celeron N4020 has a 70.2% higher aggregate performance score, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 566.7% lower power consumption.

The Celeron N4020 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon 5148 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon 5148 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron N4020 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon 5148 and Celeron N4020, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon 5148
Xeon 5148
Intel Celeron N4020
Celeron N4020

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 5148 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1771 vote

Rate Celeron N4020 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon 5148 or Celeron N4020, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.