i3-N300 vs Atom Z2580
Aggregate performance score
Core i3-N300 outperforms Atom Z2580 by a whopping 2052% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Atom Z2580 and Core i3-N300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 3165 | 1171 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Power efficiency | 7.89 | 72.74 |
Architecture codename | Clovertrail (2013) | Alder Lake-N (2023) |
Release date | 27 February 2013 (11 years ago) | 3 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $309 |
Detailed specifications
Atom Z2580 and Core i3-N300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 8 |
Base clock speed | no data | 0.1 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 96 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (per module) |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 6 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
Die size | 65 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | 105 °C |
Number of transistors | 140 million | no data |
64 bit support | - | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Atom Z2580 and Core i3-N300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FC-MB4760 | Intel BGA 1264 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 7 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z2580 and Core i3-N300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3 | no data |
AES-NI | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
Smart Idle | + | no data |
Security technologies
Atom Z2580 and Core i3-N300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z2580 and Core i3-N300 are enumerated here.
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom Z2580 and Core i3-N300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 8.5 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | PowerVR SGX544MP2 (400 MHz) | Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) ( - 1250 MHz) |
Graphics max frequency | 533 MHz | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Atom Z2580 and Core i3-N300 integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 2 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom Z2580 and Core i3-N300.
PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 9 |
USB revision | 2.0 OTG, USB-SPH 2.0 | no data |
Number of USB ports | 2 | no data |
UART | 3 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.25 | 5.38 |
Recency | 27 February 2013 | 3 January 2023 |
Physical cores | 2 | 8 |
Threads | 4 | 8 |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 7 Watt |
Atom Z2580 has 133.3% lower power consumption.
i3-N300, on the other hand, has a 2052% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.
The Core i3-N300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom Z2580 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom Z2580 and Core i3-N300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.