Celeron N5100 vs Xeon 3.20
Primary details
Comparing Xeon 3.20 and Celeron N5100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 1783 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Architecture codename | Gallatin (2003−2004) | Jasper Lake (2021) |
| Release date | October 2003 (20 years ago) | 11 January 2021 (3 years ago) |
| Current price | $1098 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Xeon 3.20 and Celeron N5100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | 8 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 1.5 MB |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 237 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | 286 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon 3.20 and Celeron N5100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | 604 | FCBGA1338 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 97 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 3.20 and Celeron N5100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2 |
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | no data | + |
| Smart Response | no data | - |
| GPIO | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | - |
| Status | no data | Launched |
Security technologies
Xeon 3.20 and Celeron N5100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| Identity Protection | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | - |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 3.20 and Celeron N5100 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 3.20 and Celeron N5100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 16 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| ECC memory support | no data | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics |
| Quick Sync Video | no data | + |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 800 MHz |
| Execution Units | no data | 24 |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Xeon 3.20 and Celeron N5100 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 3 |
| eDP | no data | + |
| DisplayPort | no data | + |
| HDMI | no data | + |
| MIPI-DSI | no data | + |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon 3.20 and Celeron N5100 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| 4K resolution support | no data | + |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | no data | 4096x2160@60Hz |
| Max resolution over eDP | no data | 4096x2160@60Hz |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | no data | 4096x2160@60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Xeon 3.20 and Celeron N5100 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | 12 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.5 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 3.20 and Celeron N5100.
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
| USB revision | no data | 2.0/3.2 |
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | no data | 2 |
| Number of USB ports | no data | 14 |
| Integrated LAN | no data | - |
| UART | no data | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Celeron N5100 outperforms Xeon 3.20 by 594% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 4 |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 97 Watt | 6 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Xeon 3.20 and Celeron N5100. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon 3.20 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron N5100 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon 3.20 and Celeron N5100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
