Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS vs Xeon 3.2

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon 3.2 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated380
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiencyno data56.76
Architecture codenameIrwindale (2004)Hawk Point (2024)
Release dateJune 2004 (20 years ago)16 April 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon 3.2 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads116
Base clock speedno data3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache16 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm4 nm
Die size169 mm2178 mm2
Number of transistors178 million25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon 3.2 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket604FP7
Power consumption (TDP)135 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 3.2 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 3.2 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 3.2 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 780M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 3.2 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 8
Threads 1 16
Chip lithography 90 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 135 Watt 28 Watt

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS has 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, a 2150% more advanced lithography process, and 382.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon 3.2 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon 3.2 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon 3.2
Xeon 3.2
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 3.2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 10 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon 3.2 or Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.