E2-3000 vs Xeon 5148

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon 5148
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 40 Watt
0.57
+26.7%
E2-3000
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.45

Xeon 5148 outperforms E2-3000 by a significant 27% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon 5148 and E2-3000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28893004
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.05no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD E-Series
Power efficiency1.362.86
DesignerIntelAMD
Architecture codenameWoodcrest (2006)Kabini (2013−2014)
Release dateJune 2006 (18 years ago)23 May 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$9no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon 5148 and E2-3000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed2.33 GHz1.65 GHz
L1 cache0 KBno data
L2 cache4 MB1024 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data246 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data90 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon 5148 and E2-3000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket771FT3
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 5148 and E2-3000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX
AES-NI-+
FMA-FMA4
AVX-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 5148 and E2-3000 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 5148 and E2-3000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR3
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 8280
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon 5148 and E2-3000 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon 5148 and E2-3000 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 5148 and E2-3000.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon 5148 0.57
+26.7%
E2-3000 0.45

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon 5148 912
+25.6%
E2-3000 726

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.57 0.45
Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 15 Watt

Xeon 5148 has a 26.7% higher aggregate performance score.

E2-3000, on the other hand, has a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 166.7% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon 5148 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD E2-3000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon 5148 is a server/workstation processor while E2-3000 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon 5148
Xeon 5148
AMD E2-3000
E2-3000

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 5148 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 26 votes

Rate E2-3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon 5148 and E2-3000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.