Xeon 3.20 vs 3.06

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon 3.06 and Xeon 3.20 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Architecture codenameGallatin (2003−2004)Gallatin (2003−2004)
Release dateMarch 2003 (21 year ago)October 2003 (21 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon 3.06 and Xeon 3.20 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed3.07 GHz3.2 GHz
L1 cache16K8 KB
L2 cache512 KB512 KB
L3 cache2 MB2 MB
Chip lithography130 nm130 nm
Die size237 mm2237 mm2
Number of transistors286 million286 million
64 bit support--
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon 3.06 and Xeon 3.20 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
Socket604604
Power consumption (TDP)97 Watt97 Watt

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon 3.06 533
+11.5%
Xeon 3.20 478

Pros & cons summary


We couldn't decide between Xeon 3.06 and Xeon 3.20. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon 3.06 and Xeon 3.20, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon 3.06
Xeon 3.06
Intel Xeon 3.20
Xeon 3.20

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Xeon 3.06 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 6 votes

Rate Xeon 3.20 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon 3.06 or Xeon 3.20, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.