Ryzen Embedded 8640U vs Xeon 2.8

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon 2.8 and Ryzen Embedded 8640U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Architecture codenamePaxville (2002−2005)Hawk Point (2024)
Release dateSeptember 2002 (22 years ago)2 April 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon 2.8 and Ryzen Embedded 8640U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speedno data3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz4.9 GHz
L1 cache16 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography130 nm4 nm
Die size217 mm2178 mm2
Number of transistors200 million25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon 2.8 and Ryzen Embedded 8640U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
Socket604FP8
Power consumption (TDP)135 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 2.8 and Ryzen Embedded 8640U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 2.8 and Ryzen Embedded 8640U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 2.8 and Ryzen Embedded 8640U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 760M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 2.8 and Ryzen Embedded 8640U.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 12
Chip lithography 130 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 135 Watt 28 Watt

Ryzen Embedded 8640U has 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, a 3150% more advanced lithography process, and 382.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon 2.8 and Ryzen Embedded 8640U. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon 2.8 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen Embedded 8640U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon 2.8 and Ryzen Embedded 8640U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon 2.8
Xeon 2.8
AMD Ryzen Embedded 8640U
Ryzen Embedded 8640U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 2.8 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen Embedded 8640U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon 2.8 or Ryzen Embedded 8640U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.