VIA C3 Processor 1.0 vs VIA Nano U2250
Primary details
Comparing VIA Nano U2250 and VIA C3 Processor 1.0 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | VIA Nano | no data |
| Architecture codename | Isaiah (2009) | Ezra-T (2002) |
| Release date | 1 January 2009 (15 years ago) | 3 June 2002 (22 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $62 |
Detailed specifications
VIA Nano U2250 and VIA C3 Processor 1.0 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 1 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 64 KB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | no data | 56 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 16 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on VIA Nano U2250 and VIA C3 Processor 1.0 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | NanoBGA2 | 370 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 January 2009 | 3 June 2002 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 130 nm |
VIA Nano U2250 has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between VIA Nano U2250 and VIA C3 Processor 1.0. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that VIA Nano U2250 is a notebook processor while VIA C3 Processor 1.0 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between VIA Nano U2250 and VIA C3 Processor 1.0, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
