Phenom X4 9850 (125W) vs VIA Nano QuadCore L4700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Phenom X4 9850 (125W) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesVIAno data
Architecture codenameCNQ (2011)Agena (2007−2008)
Release date17 May 2011 (13 years ago)July 2008 (16 years ago)
Current priceno data$87

Detailed specifications

VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Phenom X4 9850 (125W) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.46 GHz2.5 GHz
Bus support1333 MHzno data
L1 cache512 KB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography40 nm65 nm
Die size132 mm2285 mm2
Number of transistorsno data450 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Phenom X4 9850 (125W) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGAAM2+
Power consumption (TDP)27.5 Watt125 Watt

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Phenom X4 9850 (125W) are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 40 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 125 Watt

We couldn't decide between VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Phenom X4 9850 (125W). We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 is a notebook processor while Phenom X4 9850 (125W) is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Phenom X4 9850 (125W), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


VIA Nano QuadCore L4700
Nano QuadCore L4700
AMD Phenom X4 9850 (125W)
Phenom X4 9850 (125W)

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 54 votes

Rate Phenom X4 9850 (125W) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 or Phenom X4 9850 (125W), agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.