Athlon Silver 3050U vs VIA Nano QuadCore L4700

VS

Aggregate performance score

VIA Nano QuadCore L4700
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 27 Watt
0.47
Athlon Silver 3050U
2020
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
1.88
+300%

Athlon Silver 3050U outperforms VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 by a whopping 300% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Athlon Silver 3050U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29321986
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesVIAAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)
Power efficiency1.6211.86
Architecture codenameCNQ (2011)Dali (Zen) (2020)
Release date17 May 2011 (13 years ago)6 January 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Athlon Silver 3050U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.2 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.46 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus rate1333 MHzno data
Multiplierno data23
L1 cache512 KB192 KB
L2 cache4 MB1 MB
L3 cacheno data4 MB
Chip lithography40 nm14 nm
Die size132 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Number of transistorsno data4500 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Athlon Silver 3050U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketBGAFP5
Power consumption (TDP)27.5 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Athlon Silver 3050U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Athlon Silver 3050U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Athlon Silver 3050U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 2 ( - 1100 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Athlon Silver 3050U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.47 1.88
Recency 17 May 2011 6 January 2020
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 15 Watt

VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Athlon Silver 3050U, on the other hand, has a 300% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 80% lower power consumption.

The Athlon Silver 3050U is our recommended choice as it beats the VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Athlon Silver 3050U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


VIA Nano QuadCore L4700
Nano QuadCore L4700
AMD Athlon Silver 3050U
Athlon Silver 3050U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 4 votes

Rate VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 8049 votes

Rate Athlon Silver 3050U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 or Athlon Silver 3050U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.