Athlon Silver 3050e vs VIA Nano QuadCore L4700
Aggregate performance score
Athlon Silver 3050e outperforms VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 by a whopping 298% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Athlon Silver 3050e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2946 | 2015 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | VIA | AMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU) |
| Power efficiency | 1.60 | 29.10 |
| Architecture codename | CNQ (2011) | Dali (Zen) (2020) |
| Release date | 17 May 2011 (13 years ago) | 1 June 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Athlon Silver 3050e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 1.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.46 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Bus rate | 1333 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | 192 KB |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 132 mm2 | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Athlon Silver 3050e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | BGA | FP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27.5 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Athlon Silver 3050e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Athlon Silver 3050e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1000 MHz) |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.46 | 1.83 |
| Recency | 17 May 2011 | 1 June 2020 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 6 Watt |
VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 has 100% more physical cores.
Athlon Silver 3050e, on the other hand, has a 297.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 350% lower power consumption.
The Athlon Silver 3050e is our recommended choice as it beats the VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Athlon Silver 3050e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
