7 240H vs VIA Nano QuadCore C4650
Primary details
Comparing VIA Nano QuadCore C4650 and Core 7 240H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Architecture codename | CNR (2015) | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 2015 (9 years ago) | 18 December 2024 (recently) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $502 |
Detailed specifications
VIA Nano QuadCore C4650 and Core 7 240H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 1.33 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 5.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 24 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 46 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on VIA Nano QuadCore C4650 and Core 7 240H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | VIA nanoBGA2 | Intel BGA 1744 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by VIA Nano QuadCore C4650 and Core 7 240H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
VIA Nano QuadCore C4650 and Core 7 240H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by VIA Nano QuadCore C4650 and Core 7 240H are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by VIA Nano QuadCore C4650 and Core 7 240H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4, DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Iris Xe Graphics 64EU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by VIA Nano QuadCore C4650 and Core 7 240H.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 4 | 10 |
| Threads | 4 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 45 Watt |
VIA Nano QuadCore C4650 has 150% lower power consumption.
7 240H, on the other hand, has 150% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between VIA Nano QuadCore C4650 and Core 7 240H. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between VIA Nano QuadCore C4650 and Core 7 240H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
