Atom C3850 vs VIA Nano L2100
Primary details
Comparing VIA Nano L2100 and Atom C3850 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Nano | Intel Atom |
| Architecture codename | Isaiah (2009) | Goldmont (2016−2017) |
| Release date | no data | 15 August 2017 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $323 |
| Current price | no data | $850 (2.6x MSRP) |
Detailed specifications
VIA Nano L2100 and Atom C3850 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Bus support | 800 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 672 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 12 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 12 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 78 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on VIA Nano L2100 and Atom C3850 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | FCBGA1310 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by VIA Nano L2100 and Atom C3850. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| QuickAssist | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Status | no data | Launched |
Security technologies
VIA Nano L2100 and Atom C3850 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | no data | + |
| Secure Boot | no data | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | - |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by VIA Nano L2100 and Atom C3850 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by VIA Nano L2100 and Atom C3850. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4: 2400 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 256 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 34.134 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | no data | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by VIA Nano L2100 and Atom C3850.
| PCIe version | no data | 3 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
| USB revision | no data | 3 |
| Total number of SATA ports | no data | 16 |
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | no data | 16 |
| Number of USB ports | no data | 8 |
| Integrated LAN | no data | 2x10/2.5/1 GBE |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 12 |
| Threads | 1 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 14 nm |
We couldn't decide between VIA Nano L2100 and Atom C3850. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that VIA Nano L2100 is a notebook processor while Atom C3850 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between VIA Nano L2100 and Atom C3850, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
