Core Ultra 7 164U vs VIA C7-M C7-M-2000
Primary details
Comparing VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 and Core Ultra 7 164U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | not rated | 764 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | C7-M | Intel Meteor Lake-U |
Architecture codename | Esther | Meteor Lake-U (2023) |
Release date | no data | 14 December 2023 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 and Core Ultra 7 164U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
Threads | 1 | 14 |
Base clock speed | no data | 1.1 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
Bus rate | 533 MHz | no data |
L1 cache | no data | 112 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | no data | 2 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | no data | 12 MB |
Chip lithography | 90 nm | 7 nm |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 110 °C |
64 bit support | - | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 and Core Ultra 7 164U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
Socket | no data | Intel BGA 2551 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 9 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 and Core Ultra 7 164U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
vPro | no data | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 and Core Ultra 7 164U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 and Core Ultra 7 164U are enumerated here.
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 and Core Ultra 7 164U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | no data | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 and Core Ultra 7 164U.
PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 1 | 12 |
Threads | 1 | 14 |
Chip lithography | 90 nm | 7 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 9 Watt |
Ultra 7 164U has 1100% more physical cores and 1300% more threads, a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 122.2% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 and Core Ultra 7 164U. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 and Core Ultra 7 164U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.