Athlon 64 LE-1600 vs VIA C7-M C7-M-2000
Primary details
Comparing VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 and Athlon 64 LE-1600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | C7-M | no data |
| Architecture codename | Esther | Windsor (2006−2007) |
| Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | October 2007 (17 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 and Athlon 64 LE-1600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 533 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | no data | 230 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 69 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 227 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 and Athlon 64 LE-1600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | AM2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 45 Watt |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 and Athlon 64 LE-1600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR2 |
Pros & cons summary
| Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 45 Watt |
VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 has 125% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 and Athlon 64 LE-1600. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 LE-1600 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 and Athlon 64 LE-1600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
