Ryzen Embedded V1605B vs V-Series V160
Primary details
Comparing V-Series V160 and Ryzen Embedded V1605B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1377 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD V-Series | AMD Ryzen Embedded |
| Power efficiency | no data | 26.50 |
| Architecture codename | Champlain (2010−2011) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 1 December 2010 (13 years ago) | 21 February 2018 (6 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
V-Series V160 and Ryzen Embedded V1605B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Bus rate | 3200 MHz | no data |
| Multiplier | no data | 20 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 2 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | no data | 210 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 4,950 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on V-Series V160 and Ryzen Embedded V1605B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | S1 | FP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by V-Series V160 and Ryzen Embedded V1605B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, 3DNow, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by V-Series V160 and Ryzen Embedded V1605B are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by V-Series V160 and Ryzen Embedded V1605B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4 Dual-channel |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 32 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 38.397 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1100 MHz) |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 December 2010 | 21 February 2018 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 4 |
| Threads | 1 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 15 Watt |
Ryzen Embedded V1605B has an age advantage of 7 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between V-Series V160 and Ryzen Embedded V1605B. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that V-Series V160 is a notebook processor while Ryzen Embedded V1605B is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between V-Series V160 and Ryzen Embedded V1605B, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
