Xeon E5440 vs V-Series V140
Aggregate performance score
Xeon E5440 outperforms V-Series V140 by a whopping 456% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing V-Series V140 and Xeon E5440 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 3125 | 2142 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Server |
Series | AMD V-Series | no data |
Power efficiency | 1.02 | 1.77 |
Architecture codename | Champlain (2010−2011) | no data |
Release date | 4 October 2010 (14 years ago) | 1 January 2008 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
V-Series V140 and Xeon E5440 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | no data |
Threads | 1 | no data |
Base clock speed | no data | 2.83 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.3 GHz | no data |
Bus rate | 3200 MHz | no data |
L1 cache | 128 KB | no data |
L2 cache | 512 KB | no data |
L3 cache | no data | 12 MB L2 Cache |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 67 °C |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
VID voltage range | no data | 0.85V-1.35V |
Compatibility
Information on V-Series V140 and Xeon E5440 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Socket | S1 | LGA771 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 80 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by V-Series V140 and Xeon E5440. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | MMX, 3DNow, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization | no data |
VirusProtect | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
Idle States | no data | + |
Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Demand Based Switching | no data | + |
FSB parity | no data | + |
Security technologies
V-Series V140 and Xeon E5440 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | - |
EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by V-Series V140 and Xeon E5440 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
VT-x | no data | + |
EPT | no data | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by V-Series V140 and Xeon E5440. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.27 | 1.50 |
Recency | 4 October 2010 | 1 January 2008 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 80 Watt |
V-Series V140 has an age advantage of 2 years, and 220% lower power consumption.
Xeon E5440, on the other hand, has a 455.6% higher aggregate performance score.
The Xeon E5440 is our recommended choice as it beats the V-Series V140 in performance tests.
Be aware that V-Series V140 is a notebook processor while Xeon E5440 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between V-Series V140 and Xeon E5440, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.