Mobile Pentium 4 532 vs V-Series V140
Aggregate performance score
V-Series V140 outperforms Mobile Pentium 4 532 by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing V-Series V140 and Mobile Pentium 4 532 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 3125 | 3165 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | AMD V-Series | Mobile Pentium 4 |
Power efficiency | 1.02 | 0.26 |
Architecture codename | Champlain (2010−2011) | Prescott (2001−2005) |
Release date | 4 October 2010 (14 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
V-Series V140 and Mobile Pentium 4 532 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 1 | 1 |
Boost clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 3.06 GHz |
Bus rate | 3200 MHz | 533 MHz |
L1 cache | 128 KB | no data |
L2 cache | 512 KB | no data |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 90 nm |
64 bit support | + | - |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on V-Series V140 and Mobile Pentium 4 532 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Socket | S1 | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 88 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by V-Series V140 and Mobile Pentium 4 532. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | MMX, 3DNow, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization | no data |
VirusProtect | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by V-Series V140 and Mobile Pentium 4 532 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by V-Series V140 and Mobile Pentium 4 532. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.27 | 0.24 |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 90 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 88 Watt |
V-Series V140 has a 12.5% higher aggregate performance score, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 252% lower power consumption.
The V-Series V140 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobile Pentium 4 532 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between V-Series V140 and Mobile Pentium 4 532, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.