Xeon D-1713NTE vs V-Series V105
Primary details
Comparing V-Series V105 and Xeon D-1713NTE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | AMD V-Series | no data |
| Release date | 12 May 2010 (14 years ago) | 1 January 2022 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
V-Series V105 and Xeon D-1713NTE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Bus rate | 2000 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | no data |
| L3 cache | no data | 10 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 10 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on V-Series V105 and Xeon D-1713NTE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | S1 | FCBGA2227 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 9 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by V-Series V105 and Xeon D-1713NTE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization | Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| QuickAssist | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
V-Series V105 and Xeon D-1713NTE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by V-Series V105 and Xeon D-1713NTE are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by V-Series V105 and Xeon D-1713NTE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 256 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by V-Series V105 and Xeon D-1713NTE.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
| USB revision | no data | 3.0 |
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | no data | 24 |
| Number of USB ports | no data | 4 |
| Integrated LAN | no data | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 12 May 2010 | 1 January 2022 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 4 |
| Threads | 1 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 9 Watt | 45 Watt |
V-Series V105 has 400% lower power consumption.
Xeon D-1713NTE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between V-Series V105 and Xeon D-1713NTE. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that V-Series V105 is a notebook processor while Xeon D-1713NTE is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between V-Series V105 and Xeon D-1713NTE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
